Brisbane: (07) 3221 4999
Gold Coast: (07) 5532 3133
24 Hour Crime Line: 0488 999 980 or 18004POTTS
Santos Place, Level 6, 32 Turbot Street,
Brisbane 4000
(07) 3221 4999
Gold Coast
44 Davenport St,
Southport 4215
(07) 5532 3133
24 Hour Crime Line
0488 999 980 or 18004POTTS







Supplying Drugs To Children

Potts Lawyers > Criminal Law  > Commonwealth Offences > Supplying Drugs To Children

The supply of a controlled drug to a child is a criminal offence under the Commonwealth Criminal Code. If charged, it’s important that you seek legal advice from a knowledgable criminal lawyer experienced in Commonwealth matters.

What the law says

Sections 309.2 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code states:

(1) A person commits an offence if:

(a) the person supplies a substance to an individual; and

(b) the individual is a child; and

(c) the substance is a controlled drug; and

(2) Strict Liability applies to paragraph (1)(b)

(3) The fault element for paragraph (1)(c) is recklessness.

What the police must prove

In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt.

The accused

1. supplied a substance to an individual; and

2. the individual was a child; and

3. the substance is a controlled drug.

the person is taken to have possessed the substance with the intention of using some or all of the substance to manufacture a controlled drug.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.

Maximum penalty

The Maximum penalty for the offence of Supplying Drugs to Children is 5 years imprisonment or 3000 penalty units or both.

Which court will hear the matter

This matter is Commonwealth Offence which means it is dealt with in the Supreme Court.

Possible defences

Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to

  1. The accused did not supply a substance.
  2. The individual was not a child.
  3. The accused had a reasonable and honest belief the individual was not a child.
  4. The substance was not a controlled drug.

Do you need legal help? Contact us now.

Contact us now

free consultation

Click-To-Call Free Consultation