Brisbane: (07) 3221 4999
Gold Coast: (07) 5532 3133
24 Hour Crime Line: 0488 999 980 or 18004POTTS
Brisbane
Level 1/420 George St,
Brisbane 4000
(07) 3221 4999
Gold Coast
44 Davenport St,
Southport 4215
(07) 5532 3133
24 Hour Crime Line
0488 999 980 or 18004POTTS

Facebook


Instagram

Twitter


Linkedin

YouTube

 

Hooning – Undue Smoke And Noise

Potts Lawyers > Traffic Lawyers Brisbane & Gold Coast > Hooning – Undue Smoke And Noise

What the law says

Section 291 of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation Queensland states:

(1) A person must not-

  • (a) start a vehicle, or drive a vehicle, in a way that makes unnecessary noise or smoke; or
  • (b) wilfully start a vehicle, or drive a vehicle, in a way that makes unnecessary noise or smoke.

What the police must prove

In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) The accused started or drove a vehicle; AND

(2) The vehicle made unnecessary noise or smoke in the process of starting or driving the vehicle.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.

Maximum penalty

Maximum penalty-20 Penalty units

Note the Police have power to impound or forfeit your vehicle for repeat offence.  For more information please click here.

Penalty unit = $100.00

Which court will hear the matter

This matter is an infringement of a regulation rather than an offence and will not be heard in court unless you choose to appeal the matter or you fail to pay the fine, in which case the matter will be heard in the Magistrates Court.

Possible defences

Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to

1. The accused did not in fact make unnecessary noise or smoke in the process of starting the vehicle.

2. The accused did not in fact make unnecessary noise or smoke in the process of driving the

3. Duress example: there was a threat of harm against the accused or another person that the accused reasonably believe would be carried out if he/she did do the act/s that constitute the offence.

4. Necessity/Accident – example: there was an extraordinary emergency that compelled the accused to drive in a manner that resulted in unnecessary noise or smoke.

5. Insanity.

6. Identification i.e. the driver was not the accused.

7. Mistake of fact – example: the accused believed that circumstances existed that allowed him/her to drive in a manner that created noise and or smoke (i.e. believed that were involved in a legitimate event that involved drifting, burn outs etc.).

Do you need legal help or consultance? Contact us now.

Contact us now

free consultation